The material on this website is provided by Beeson, Tayer & Bodine for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult with their own legal counsel before acting on any of the information presented. Some of the articles are updated periodically, and are marked with the date of the last update. Again, readers should consult with their own legal counsel for the most current information and to obtain professional advice before acting on any of the information presented.
Archive for June, 2013
Store Manager Entitled to Overtime Pay
June 19, 2013 by
Abenicio Cisneros
California employment law provides guidance for overtime pay related to exempt and non-exempt job duties. This case summarized by Beeson, Tayer & Bodine provides guidance that helps establish employee rights to overtime pay. A California Court… Read More
Dills Act Does Not Prevent Legislature from Modifying MOU’s Prior to Impasse
June 13, 2013 by
Adrian Barnes
The law firm of Beeson, Tayer & Bodine provides this summary of a public sector labor law finding on union bargaining agreements that are in conflict with California legislation. BT&B attorneys provide expertise to help… Read More
Employer Association is Not Employer of Association Member’s Employees
June 12, 2013 by
Adrian Barnes
In a recent opinion, a California appellate court fleshed out the law on when an association of member employers can, itself, be considered an employer of its members’ employees. The case is McCoy v. Pacific… Read More
CA Supreme Court Rules Public Sector Unions Have Absolute Right to Non-Member Contact Information
June 7, 2013 by
Dalisai Nisperos
The California Supreme Court, in a decision issued May 30, 2013, ruled that public sector unions have a right to obtain home contact information of union-represented public employees, reversing a court of appeal decision that… Read More
Careful What You Ask For – A Job is “Property” under California’s Extortion Statute
June 3, 2013 by
Adrian Barnes
An appeals court has found that a demand for employment constitutes a demand for property within the meaning of California’s extortion statute. The case is People v. Fisher. Defendant Timothy Fisher applied for a job… Read More
Store Manager Entitled to Overtime Pay
June 19, 2013 by Abenicio Cisneros
California employment law provides guidance for overtime pay related to exempt and non-exempt job duties. This case summarized by Beeson, Tayer & Bodine provides guidance that helps establish employee rights to overtime pay. A California Court… Read More
Dills Act Does Not Prevent Legislature from Modifying MOU’s Prior to Impasse
June 13, 2013 by Adrian Barnes
The law firm of Beeson, Tayer & Bodine provides this summary of a public sector labor law finding on union bargaining agreements that are in conflict with California legislation. BT&B attorneys provide expertise to help… Read More
Employer Association is Not Employer of Association Member’s Employees
June 12, 2013 by Adrian Barnes
In a recent opinion, a California appellate court fleshed out the law on when an association of member employers can, itself, be considered an employer of its members’ employees. The case is McCoy v. Pacific… Read More
CA Supreme Court Rules Public Sector Unions Have Absolute Right to Non-Member Contact Information
June 7, 2013 by Dalisai Nisperos
The California Supreme Court, in a decision issued May 30, 2013, ruled that public sector unions have a right to obtain home contact information of union-represented public employees, reversing a court of appeal decision that… Read More
Careful What You Ask For – A Job is “Property” under California’s Extortion Statute
June 3, 2013 by Adrian Barnes
An appeals court has found that a demand for employment constitutes a demand for property within the meaning of California’s extortion statute. The case is People v. Fisher. Defendant Timothy Fisher applied for a job… Read More
